ArchivesBlogrollBlogroll |
August 31st, 2010
On the one hand, I thought Ron Charles’s Washington Post video review of Jonathan Franzen’s Freedom was laugh-out-loud hilarious. I also thought he nailed what was both great and lacking in the novel, and I think those things without having read the novel itself. That’s how much I’ve learned about this book prior to its publication. I’m glad I don’t need to read it, because I haven’t even received my copy, and I’m already tired of thinking about it. On the other hand, I’m enough of a cantankerous, survivalist type to worry a little bit about book reviews now needing to come in punchy video format in order to get anyone’s attention. Surely people who read books ought to be willing to take the time to read reviews, no? Now, if you will excuse me, I need to chase some kids off my lawn. August 26th, 2010
Have you been following the literary dust up as chick lit authors Jennifer Weiner and Jodi Picoult complain about the literary coronation of Jonathan Franzen? Me either. Okay, I have a little. I’ve looked at the headlines. And today I read Jason Pinter’s interview with the two complaining ladies. It all began when Weiner and Picoult complained that when a white male like Franzen writers about relationships and feelings “it’s literature with a capital L, but when a woman considers the same topics, it’s romance, or a beach book – in short, it’s something unworthy of a serious critic’s attention.” Is it true? I don’t think so. It seems to me a new Zadie Smith novel is always treated as a literary event, and I remember a few years ago the literary salivating that went on over Clair Messud’s Emperor’s Children. More recently, there was no shortage of press and praise for Jennifer Egan’s wonderful new book. On the other hand, who could forget Scribner’s largely unsuccessful attempt to to convert Stephen King from a horror writer to a literary one? When the Times reviews a Stephen King novel, the reviewer will concede that he is an important and influential writer, but never that he is a literary writer.  A friend of mine recently called something as convoluted as the cover of Hairway to Steven. He was wrong, but I thought it was a great metaphor. The issue here is not one of gender, but of how books are presented to the marketplace. Picout and Weiner are genre writers, and genre writing is not taken as seriously as literary fiction. That’s simply a fact. Picoult admits as much when she says, “the New York Times reviews overall tend to overlook popular fiction, whether you’re a man, woman, white, black, purple or pink. I think there are a lot of readers who would like to see reviews that belong in the range of commercial fiction rather than making the blanket assumption that all commercial fiction is unworthy.” In other words, her complaint is that popular fiction doesn’t receive critical attention the way, say, popular films do (though if the Times is going to treat popular fiction the same way it treats popular film, who needs that kind of attention?). Exhibit A is the fact that the Times gave the new Franzen book a daily review and a Sunday book section review in the same week. Two reviews in one week for one book! Of course, the daily reviews and the Sunday book section are not under the same editor, and this double reviewing happens all the time for over-hyped books, and few books are as hyped as Franzen’s. It is always annoying for everyone when a book gets this kind of treatment, but that is how the business works. I also honestly don’t think that most genre writers would want to open themselves up to the scrutiny of a real critical review. While some genre writers are also great writers, most are not. On the other hand, the same is true of literary writers, a large percentage of which aren’t any good either. It is also true that there are plenty of extremely well reviewed novels out there that I personally thought sucked, and that leads to the other, more complicated, issue of taste. A review is nothing more than one reader providing an opinion for another, and if the two readers don’t have overlapping tastes, then nothing much has been accomplished. But if these writers agree that genre fiction across the board doesn’t get the same attention as genre fiction, where does the charge of sexism come in? Doing a certain amount of back peddling, Weiner notes that she would like her books to be taken as seriously “as a Jonathan Tropper or a Nick Hornby,” but those writers get attention in large part precisely because they are men writing about relationships in a way that’s unusul. Weiner and Picoult agree that women writer about relationships much more frequently, so there’s nothing unusual or remarkable about the very nature of their work. So, in the end, the whole complaint breaks down to a whole lot of nothing. The ism at work here is not sexism, but capitalism. For a variety of reasons, Franzen has been able to market himself as an important literary writer who is reinventing and revitalizing fiction. Picoult and Weiner and marketed themselves, and very successfully, as popular writers with a mass appeal. Genre writers may complain about the limitations of the genre label, but the truth is that these categories are useful for readers and for sales. Book consumers want to know what kind of book they are going to read, and publishers are only too happy to categorize in order to let them know. Just as Franzen is marketed as an important literary figure, so too are Weiner and Picoult marketed as writers you (ladies) will love. So the very commercial success that appears to bar Picoult and Weiner from the big L literary tent provides them with the media platform from which to complain about it. August 23rd, 2010
For no good reason that I can think of, I’ve created a Twitter account. Maybe this will inspire me to waste time I don’t have posting tidbits of information that you don’t need. Why now follow along? The account name is David_Liss. Should I have proceeded that with an @ symbol? Maybe. I don’t really know. Speaking of things you don’t need, here’s a fabulous video by Yeasayer. I listened to the album a few times when it first came out, and it didn’t do much for me, but the power of the visual is strong, and now I like it. I’ve often thought of getting an alien blob creature of my own. They are very affectionate, but I hear they are prone to health problems. August 19th, 2010
I now have in hand the contracts optioning A Conspiracy of Paper to Scott Free, Tony and Ridley Scott’s Production Company, on behalf of Warner Brothers. So this seems as good a time as any to address the many emails I get regarding another possible Weaver novel. As I’ve posted here several times, my next novel, The Darkening Green, will be out in about a year’s time, and it is set in 19th century Nottingham and London. It is obviously not a Benjamin Weaver novel. At this moment, I have no plans to write another Weaver novel. On the other hand, I also have no plans not to. After I finished Conspiracy, which was my first book, both my editor and agent urged me to write a sequel immediately. I understood, however, that if I were to do so, I would risk locking myself into a fairly narrow and specific career, something I didn’t want to do. Instead, I wrote The Coffee Trader, a novel that shared certain characteristics with my first book, but was different enough that I hoped it would establish a pattern of variation that would open the door to many new possibilities. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t My publisher and the major bookstore chains were not convinced The Coffee Trader was as commercial as my first book, and their reactions were lukewarm – less promotion, poorer in-store displays, etc. Nevertheless it went on to sell as well as Conspiracy. On the other hand, The Ethical Assassin may now have its own little following, and it continues to sell in back catalog, but it did very badly when it first came out. You win some, you lose some. The truth is, the second two Weaver novels have not sold as well as my stand-alone historical novels, and my publisher has actively dissuaded me from writing another sequel. I never wanted a career dominated by a series character, so for the moment my publisher’s preference and my own inclinations are in alignment, and it’s always convenient when that happens. If I wanted to write another Weaver novel, however, I would, and I would deal with the consequences. The fact is, I have so far been able to make my living writing what I want. I like my career. It’s fun. And as long as I can get away with this kind of freedom, I don’t see why I should write what I don’t want to write. Nevertheless, I do take the requests I receive from my readers very seriously. It is extremely gratifying when readers say they want another Weaver novel, or a sequel to The Whiskey Rebels or another book along the lines of The Ethical Assassin. One of the downsides of having a varied career is that some readers are always going to be disappointed by the direction I take. As far as film version of Conspiracy goes, I am guardedly optimistic that it will happen, but I’ve been down the Hollywood road often enough to know how easily a project like this can get derailed. If the movie does go into production, you can safely bet my publisher will ask me to drop whatever I’m doing and writer another Weaver novel. We’ll see what happens. July 12th, 2010
 Talking business with my editor Jennifer Hershey. Food and wine on Random House! Just got back from this year’s Thrillerfest, and had an absolutely fantastic time. Now, many of you may know what Thrillerfest is and that I go every year, and many of you may have no idea and not particularly care, but I’m sure you will keep reading to be polite. Right? Anyhow, here’s the quick rundown. Thrillerfest is the annual conference of International Thriller Writers, founded at the 2004 Boucercon (a mystery convention, for those not in the know) out of a sense that thrillers and thriller-writers required their own professional organization. This was a historic meeting at which I was present, though my role was mostly to annoy the organizers by whispering snarky comments back and forth with Partners and Crime’s Maggie Griffin. She started it, by the way.  Outdoor cafe time with Marvel Editor, Bill Rosemann. Many important business-type things were discussed. Now, the truth is that my books and I are not a natural fit at Thrillerfest, which tends to emphasize novels in the espionage, serial killer and hunt-for-the-ancient-artifact-and/or-secret camp. Few writers who linger in the “literary thriller” classification bother to show up, and historical thriller writers are few enough that this year I was on a panel entitled, “Historical Thrillers” How Vital is the Subgenre?” Why not call it “Historical Thrillers: Who Cares?” As far as I know, literary thriller writers don’t have their own convention. Maybe those guys aren’t friendly, and if that’s the case, who wants to hang out with them? Mainstream thriller writers, however — those guys are fun! So if Thrillerfest is not a perfect match for my kind of books, it’s still a great party and a productive way to spend my time. This year I had a packed schedule of meetings with various editors, journalists, and potential partners in all sorts of nifty projects. I met with my Random House editor to discuss my new novel, and I met with my editor at Marvel to discuss my many upcoming projects there (none of which I can talk about yet – but soon. I promise).  Me and Christopher Goldman, who edited The New Dead -- the zombie anthology in which I had a short story. We are cooking up some crazy stuff here. And there is no shortage of casual conversations and encounters that open doors and usher in opportunities. Plus, some of my best friends in the biz come to this convention, and I always leave feeling all warm and fuzzy. On top of all that, I’ve participated in a number of International Thriller Writers publications over the years, including the short story anthology Thriller: Stories to Keep You Up All Night and the serial novel Watchlist – which you may have heard about on NPR. This year I attended the launch and signing party for the non-fiction collection Thrillers: 100 Must Reads, in which I have an essay. The book takes the long view of the evolution of the Thriller (the  Signing books and hanging out with swell pal Leslie Silbert. opening essay by Lee Child is on the Theseus myth). My piece, by the way, is on Daniel Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe, which I hope means that I remain ITW’s go-to guy for the British 18th century. But all that is beside the point. The point, if I remember correctly, is that Thrillerfest is an awesome time. I’ll see you there next year. July 6th, 2010
 Byron. The chicks in this story will dig him. Okay, time for a quick update. Who am I? Where am I going? What am I doing? These are all important questions, and I’m glad you asked. I have just submitted the final (I hope!) draft of the new novel, The Darkening Green, to my editor. If all goes well, it should be on sale in autumn, 2011. Here’s a brief description that I wrote for my agent about a year ago. Surprisingly, it is still accurate: Linked to real historical events and people – the Luddite uprising, the assassination of Prime Minister Spencer Perceval, the Napoleonic Wars, Lord Byron, William Blake, the Prince Regent – The Darkening Green is the world of Jane Austen turned on its head. It is the splendor of the Regency as we have come to idealize it, but it is also the Regency as it was lived by millions of British women and men – poverty, recession, famine, food riots, political instability, the beginning of an industrial revolution that will destroy entire communities and ways of living, and the desperate laborers who fought against the inevitable.
 Blake. A brilliant weirdo. It is the story of Lucy Derrick, once a spoiled child of privilege, now just another powerless woman to be bought and sold on the marriage market. But Lucy finds herself drawn into a world in transition, where the belief in traditional magic meets the pitiless science of capitalism and where the cold philosophy of Adam Smith meets the boundless hope of romanticism. As powerful forces wrestle over Lucy’s future, she finds herself at the center of one of the great cultural shifts in European history, pursued by Lord Byron, and in pursuit of a mad visionary named William Blake who holds the key to her future. The Darkening Green is an adventure, a romance, and a meditation on the idea of magic and the nature of belief. So, what now, you may wonder. Well, remember when I told you about the “illustrated novel” I was doing for indie comics publisher Radical, and you then forgot all about it? Well, it’s time to remember again, because that is now my number one job. I am also working on two projects for Marvel, neither of which I can tell you about because they have not been announced. Once they are, I will tell you plenty. I also have two short stories due before the end of the year. So no worries, I am keeping busy. Then, this weekend, it’s Thrillerfest. I hope to update my blog with lots of photos of famous novelists acting drunk and silly. June 29th, 2010
 The man himself. With Moses on a Snail, the new Robert Pollard album – his first solo record since January! – officially out next Tuesday, it seems like a good opportunity to talk a little bit about my Robert Pollard obsession. And I think it is an obsession. At least an unhealthy interest. Between his work with his original band, Guided by Voices, solo recordings, and various other projects and bands, including his new band, Boston Spaceships, I have more than 1,100 Pollard songs on my iPod. While that by no means represents a definitive collection, I think it shows more than a passing interest. Some of you may have no idea who Pollard is, or why I would collect his prolific output with such loyalty and enthusiasm. In the paragraphs to follow, I’ll try to explain, but keep in mind that this, by its very nature, has to be a long post. So, for me this happy journey began in 2003, when a college friend and I decided to exchange CDs featuring some of the music we’ve been listening to in recent years. The mix he made for me included the song “Everywhere with Helicopter,” from the Guided by Voices record Universal Truths and Cycles. I was instantly intrigued by its clever intervention with British Invasion musical tropes, its engaging and nonsensical lyrics, and its full throttle pop sensibilities that combined with a kind of edgy (or, perhaps, sloppy?) disregard for form. I began to snatch up everything I could find by Guided by Voices, and then the solo Pollard material, and then the various side projects. Now, I admit I have a slight tendency toward the obsessive – arguably not such a bad quality for someone whose work involves a great deal of research. It is also true that the my obsessive impulses can manifest in curious ways. My wife will happily tell you the story of how, while studying for my oral exams in grad school, I began to compulsively stock up on gallon bottles of drinking water. At one point I had more than three dozen, and that made me happy. So the endless output of a genuine musical genius, who can be counted on to release 4 or 5 major albums over the course of a year, along with a handful of singles and EPs, certainly feeds into that urge to — not precisely collect, but certainly amass. And you know your obsessed when you love this sloppy video just because you get to look inside Pollard’s house. There is, however, also something absolutely compelling in Pollard’s own story. Guided by Voices began as a kind of collective of Pollard and drunken friends who would record in basements on 4-tracks or boom boxes. They didn’t play live and they had almost no audience. In the early ‘90s, when the members of this circle were in their mid-30s, the demands of family life began to fray at the band, and Pollard (then a middle school teacher) knew he could no longer afford to keep making these albums. He therefore put all his effort into one last shot, an album called Propeller – so called because he hoped it would propel the band to fame. And, miraculously, that is exactly what happened. Propeller was a embraced by the indie scene, and Guided by Voices became a celebrated, crucially-lauded band, widely regarded as one of the most influential pioneers of the “lo-fi” movement. Pollard later became interested in using the studio and presenting a cleaner sound, but back then he was all about the rawness of the song in its early incarnation – a committed imperfectionist. So, these guys went from working class dreamers to celebrated alterna-rock-stars. It’s one of those awesome stories that just makes you happy to be alive, right? Maybe it’s just me. Anyhow, after another album and a few singles and EPs, GbV released Bee Thousand in 1994, now widely-regarded as a rock masterpiece. Some critics (for example: me!) regard it as the greatest rock album of all time and space. Others rank it somewhat lower, though will put it on their list of best 100 rock albums. In any case, it is awesomely great. Here, for example, is “Echoes Myron” from Bee Thousand. Does music get any better than this? A couple of years later most of the core original members (most notably the very talented Tobin Sprout who released some excellent solo records of his own) left the band, which received much attention but generated little revenue, in order to work their jobs and pay their mortgages. Pollard continued, and pretty soon any group of musicians he dubbed Guided by Voices was, de facto, Guided by Voices. Yet, at the same time, Pollard began to release solo albums, often with many of same musicians that appeared on the GbV albums, and yet these always had a different tone and flavor than Guided by Voices, even as that tone and flavor changed radically over the years. So, what is it about Pollard’s music that resonates with me? Besides the fact that there is much of it, and a mastery of the entire corpus is damn near impossible (and these factors should not be underestimated) much of it has to do with Pollard wearing his own influences and loves on his sleeve. Pollard knows his material, and much of his work comes across as an homage to the music he loves, so in virtually everything he does there are winks, nods and references to everything from the Beatles, the Who, Cheap Trick, and many, many more. Pollard loves a catchy hook as much as anyone in music, but he also loves to mess with that hook, to defamiliarize and render the most familiar chord uneasy. He has experimented with longer songs, but at (I think) his best, he gets in and out of his best material and his weakest experiments in under three minutes. His music is also impossible to get on a single, or even several, listens. You can listen to core Guided by Voices albums dozens of times before you realize that songs like “Demons are Real” or “Are You Faster,” which you once thought of as silly experiments, are now among your favorites. In short, it can be hard to get a handle even on material you think you know well. I like the album Robert Pollard is off to Business, but I can’t think of a single song off of it I would put on a compellation. I think Superman was a Rocker is among the worst things Pollard has ever released, yet it contains the song “Love your Spaceman,” one of my all-time favorites. There is also something about his lyrical output that adds to the addiction. Lyrically, his songs often come across as word salad, but in my view he is an absolute genius at crafting impressionistic lyrics that mean nothing and yet somehow mysteriously convey the mood of his song. Pollard plays with meaning and syntax and parts of speech so that his lyrics become a kind of labyrinth of warped signification in which the listener is constantly disoriented and displaced, forcing an intellectual engagement with something both beautiful and elusive. How awesome is that? Take, for example, the song “Harrison Adams,” from the amazing EP Motel of Fools (amazing, yes, but probably not for the uninitiated). Here are the first half of the lyrics. The core of the song hinges on the chorus, a fairly traditional rock song lament – I love you but you don’t love me anymore – but dig how the imagery of the build-up to the chorus creates a twisted, and yet vividly sharp, image of sadness and loss and disappointment. There he sits So, if you are not a Pollard fan, and yet you are somehow still reading this, where do you begin? I think there’s no better place to start than the Guided by Voices retrospective, Human Amusement at Hourly Rates. There are quite literally dozens of songs I could have argued ought to be on this compellation, but that’s the nature of the beast. It remains a great into. I recommend, by the way, giving it at least three listens, and if you still say, “What the hell is this garbage?” then take about a month off and go back for one more spin. You’ll get it. If you want to start with a particular album, Bee Thousand is absolutely the best, but it may be a bit raw for the uninitiated. Perhaps Mag Earwhig! will answer. As far as the solo and side project material, there is the two CD retrospective Crickets, which is a very good sampler, but the non-kool-aid drinkers may find its nearly three hours of music a bit overwhelming. I would start with Guided by Voices, and when you reach the point where you feel the itch, and you must have more, dig in anywhere you like. It’s all good. June 16th, 2010
So, Jennifer Egan and Devo. I wouldn’t have thought I’d be pairing these two together, but sometimes life is like that. First off is Jennifer Egan’s new book, A Visit from The Goon Squad. I’ve been I was therefore very eager to pick up A Visit from The Goon Squad, and while it does not offer the same gleeful entertainment as The Keep, it is at While disrupting and disorienting, even while gripping the reader with her compelling and moving pieces, seems to be Egan’s m.o., at the core of the novel is a sense of how we lose, or perhaps how we cast away, previous incarnations of ourselves. The characters in this novel perpetually, deceive, invent, reinvent, and forget who they are and where they have come from. Among the most poignant moments of the book are those in which characters in their 40s grapple with all they’ve left behind. Maybe I found these moments so upsetting because I’m in my 40s, and I prefer not to think about such things.  Jello Biafra. He once made fun of me. But the novel isn’t all regret and reflection. Egan’s tender and sentimental rendering of the 1980s punk scene feels totally authentic (Jello Biafra of the Dead Kennedys once told me I had crappy taste in music – how’s that for my cred?), and her willingness to explore alternate modes of narrative – one chapter is in the form of a hilarious magazine article, written by a reporter who has assaulted his interview subject; another is an usually affecting PowerPoint slideshow – demonstrate that no matter how she plays around with form, Egan knows precisely what she is doing. This is another great novel from one of my favorite writers. Released one week later, Devo’s first album in 20 years shares many of the same interests as Egan’s novel – marketing, toying with traditional forms, and an effort to be entertaining while at the same time picking apart the As for this new album, Something for Everybody, I have to admit I was surprisingly entertained. Thanks, no doubt, to all the ‘80s revival bands around these days, the music struck me as curiously fresh — at the very least, not painfully dated. I’m not entirely sure I would listen to it beyond the three or so cycles I went through in order to feel justified writing this review. On the other hand, it’s hard not to want to revisit an album with a song that includes the chorus, “Don’t tase me, bro.” May 3rd, 2010
After much delay, a visit from the mother-in-law, and a (purportedly) nasty stomach problem experienced by the friend with whom I was supposed to go, I finally got around to seeing Kick Ass, and I have to say I really enjoyed it. The 8-issue comics series – written by Mark Millar and illustrated by John Romita, Jr – on which the movie was based (now available as a graphic novel, for The film on which it is based isn’t as much of a triumph in its own medium as the comic series was, but it’s still a pretty entertaining movie – respectful to the source material, but not slavishly devoted to it. By the second half, the It’s been a while since I’ve updated my blog, so let’s talk more about stuff I like. There’s Zoe Heller’s novel, The Believers, which is probably the most I’ll definitely be digging into Heller’s previous work. Unfortunately I’ve  That's what I'm talking about. Spare me your hippy, after-lunch dancing. already seen the film based on her novel What Was She Thinking?: Notes on a Scandal, and I didn’t much care for it, what with it being tedious and all. Now, I like Cate Blanchett as much as the next guy, but I guess I prefer her chased around by a psycho Keanu Reeves in a Sam Raimi film. I get a little impatient after too many scenes of her doing a hippy dance with her family around the table after luncheon. But that’s me. Fortunately, I’ve repressed most of the movie, so I can read the book almost afresh. On the alcohol side of things, one of the best wine values I’ve come across Finally, I don’t often share my taste in music with you. There’s really not much of a percentage in it. Chances are, you find my musical inclinations inexplicable and I find yours risible. Yet we can still be friends, can’t we? But I’m late to the party on a couple of bands that just hit my wall-of-noise, guitar feedback, endless drone sweet spot, and I just had to gush. Wooden Shjips just released their third album, the appropriately named Vol. 2. As soon as I heard it, I immediately picked up their previous work. Check out the opening track from Vol. 1. When a song is almost nine minutes long, and it still feels too short, you know it’s a winner. And then there is Austin’s own Black Angels. A little more structured, a little more traditional in their song writing, but equally fuzzy, droney, feedbacky and awesome. I could listen to this stuff all day. April 18th, 2010
 Matt Smith as the 11th Doctor Many people (okay, two guys in the comic book store) have asked me for my thoughts on the new incarnation of Doctor Who, so I now bow to popular demand. I am a lifelong Doctor Who fan – or Whovian, as we are sometimes known (and not, as some have suggested, Who-ers, because that would be silly) – and I’ve loved the first four seasons of the BBCs re-launch. My thoughts on the franchise and this incarnation will follow, but the short verdict is that Matt Smith as the Doctor is great. The season premier was awesome. It was beyond awesome. It was extra super awesome, and I am very excited to see how the rest of the season unfolds. So, yes. I dig Doctor Who. I grew up watching it in the Tom Baker period. I have the Doctor Who theme as my cell phone ringer. If that makes me a dork, and I’m pretty sure it does, then so be it. And as a Doctor Who fan, I was excited, if skeptical, when the show re-launched in 2005 after many years of dormancy. But the new incarnation was a fantastic update, reaching for a more mature audience and rewarding, if not requiring, a familiarity with the show, the character, and the franchise mythology. Christopher Eccleston as the 9th Doctor was stunning, but, per prior agreement, he only stayed on one season. David Tennant was a little rocky at first, at least in my view, but he grew into the role nicely, and took the helm as the character engaged in some of the most powerful, challenging, and emotionally surprising story arcs in the show’s history. Given that the show has just begun its 31st season, that is saying something.  Until David Tennant, Tom Baker was certainly the most iconic incarnation of the Doctor. Like many people, I was disappointed when news of Smith’s casting came out. At 27, he’s the youngest actor to play the Doctor, and with his (admittedly quirky) good looks, I feared the studio execs over at BBC were trying to youthen up the franchise at the expense of the franchise itself. I was wrong. Smith gets it, sometimes eerily channeling David Tennant, but his portrayal of the character echoes many of the best incarnations: Christopher Eccleston, Tom Baker, Peter Davidson, and maybe even a little Jon Pertwee. What Eccleston and Tennant have done so well, and now Smith continues, is to convey in every scene the incredible contradiction of this character, who is both relentlessly optimistic but also deeply melancholic. When the series re-launched in 2005, Eccleston nailed the character right out of the box, keeping the old manic energy of so many of the best incarnations of the Doctor, but infusing the character with a cosmic weariness. Since the show’s last incarnation, the Doctor’s people, the Time Lords, fought a cataclysmic battle with their ancient enemies, the Daleks. Though the Time Lords have won, it has been at great cost and the Doctor is (or so he believes) the last of his kind. (It later turns out that he’s not the last of his kind, then he is again, then he’s not, and then, finally, he is. I love a good retcon.) This combination of survivor’s guilt and the illusion of invincibility goes on to drive the series, as does the introduction of much more emotionally-charged relationships with the Doctor’s string of female companions.  For my money, Eccleston's 9th Doctor is still the one to beat. Most notable is Eccleston and Tennant’s run with Billie Piper as Rose Tyler. The relationship between the Doctor and Rose is not exactly sexual, but it is sexualized, and certainly amorous. It is without doubt far more complex and emotionally compelling than the patronizing teacher/pupil relationship that dominated in the old incarnation of the show. Whatever the precise nature of their relationship, these two characters unambiguously love each other, and that love infuses the new series with an emotional urgency that older versions lacked. And it is the Doctor’s capacity to feel genuine love, as well as longing, loneliness, regret and in some especially powerful moments, reckless confidence, that the character truly blossomed first under Eccleston short but triumphant tenure, and later under Tennant. It is, admittedly, the triumphant moments that I am thinking of when I praise Doctor Who, though certainly the series can suffer from its worst impulses. There are the lazy monster-of-the-week plots as well as a needless loyalty to Cold War era enemies like the Daleks and the Cybermen who, despite special effect and conceptual retooling, still come across as somewhat dippy. On the other hand, the series often enough shows genuine brilliance, especially when willing to think outside the formula box. In particular, there’s season 2’s “Love & Monsters,” in which the Doctor comes face to face with members of his fan club; and then there is season 3’s transcendent “Blink,” easily one of the best time travel stories ever told in any medium. But back to Matt Smith and the new season. Smith comes in during the last part of the Doctor’s regeneration, and that makes things difficult. For those not in the know, and who are inexplicably still reading this review, back in the ‘60s when the original Doctor, William Hartnell, decided to leave the show, the producers came up with a clever concept that allowed them to change actors but maintain continuity. It seems that Time Lords, when injured, can “regenerate,” getting a new face and a new personality, but retaining the memories of the previous incarnations. The exact nature of the transformation is unclear, at least to me, but it seems very much that like for the old incarnation, this process is like dying. The new incarnation gets to take over a life in progress without having had a childhood or origin of any sort. Ultimately a bit disturbing, no? As a rule, regeneration episodes are almost always weak. Not so this episode, “The Eleventh Hour.” This story gets the regeneration elements out of the way and then digs in to the Doctor doing his thing – saving the earth by the seat of his pants. There is real chemistry between Smith and Karen Gillan, who plays Amy Pond, the Doctor’s new companion, and I love how their relationship begins with the Doctor horribly disappointing and failing her. He’s got a lot to prove, and that gives their interaction real energy. Steven Moffat, who has taken over from Russell T. Davies as executive producer and chief writer, delivers a script that is crisp, funny, scary, emotionally charged, tense, and gets the Doctor just right. In his final confrontation with this episode’s enemy, the Doctor makes it clear just who he is and what consequence his enemies face in crossing him. Those who have followed the series for decades will find it hard not to cheer.
|
